Category: species

The Future of Florida’s Wilderness: Rewilding and Restoration Part 1/6

A Comprehensive Vision and Strategic Outline for Ecological Renewal 

Let’s get serious about the Florida environment. This first posting outlines the three major issues regarding the future of Florida, especially Southwest FL.

The title image is a view of Estero Park Preserve. I added the sign graphic.

  • Scenarios for the future
  • Risk/benefits of rewilding
  • Consequences of species intra- and interdependence

For centuries Florida has been famed for its vibrant and diverse wilderness. It is a living repository of species drawn from the Caribbean, the Gulf, and subtropical America. Yet the past two hundred years have seen this unique ecosystem ravaged. People introduced non-native species, relentlessly homesteaded, and transformed the landscape for agricultural and urban development. The result is a wilderness in crisis. It is fragmented, altered, and teeming with exotic species that out compete or hybridize with the native flora and fauna. This document series outlines a strategic plan for the future of Florida’s wilderness. It is an examination of possible scenarios. It presents the risk/benefit calculus of rewilding. It supports species interdependence. It has a step-by-step outline for ecosystem restoration.

Definition: Rewilding is comprehensive, often large-scale, conservation effort focused on restoring sustainable biodiversity and ecosystem health. (institute of Rewilding)

A landscape in Southwest Florida showing dense vegetation, including shrubs and dry grass, representing the ecological challenges faced in the region.
This is one example of tens of thousands of citrus groves abandoned and overrun by invasive species.

A landscape view of Florida's wilderness featuring tall grass and scattered trees, highlighting the need for ecological renewal.
Babcock ranch preserve undeveloped wet prairie
A lush, green forest scene in Southwest Florida featuring a variety of trees and underbrush, showcasing the region's rich biodiversity in its natural state.
Babcock ranch preserve undeveloped upland wood

Major Scenarios for the Future of Florida’s Wilderness

Florida stands at a crossroad, with three major possible scenarios for the trajectory of its wilderness:

  • 1. Continuance as a Species Repository: For millennia, Florida has served primarily as a bank of species. Rather than an origin point for evolutionary novelties it has been a major exporter of species elsewhere. Rewilding under this scenario would focus on maintaining and nurturing native species. It preserves the region’s role as a living archive of biodiversity.
  • 2. Generator of New Species: The widespread introduction of similar but non-native species—both intentionally has created a dynamic environment. Hybridization and adaptation of ornamental and agricultural plantings will unintentionally transform Florida into a generator of new species. Unpredictable and unintentional ecological outcomes will result.
  • 3. Degraded Ecosystem: If rewilding efforts fail or are mismanaged, Florida will become an ecological cautionary tale. With native species in decline invasive species will become rampant. Ecosystem services like water purification, habitat provision, and storm protection will severely decline.

Risk / Benefit Considerations in Rewilding

The imperative to restore Florida’s wilderness must be balanced by a careful analysis of risks and benefits. Rewilding, while promising, is not without peril.

  • Genetic Integrity: Simply replacing lost native species with physically similar, but non-identical genotypes can backfire. A non-native genotype may outcompete local species or fail to provide for dependent mutualists, causing cascading ecological harms. Cloning or propagating exact native genotypes minimizes this risk while preserving ecological relationships honed over millennia.
  • Ecological Compatibility: The introduction of new or “replacement” species may disrupt established mutualisms. They may also create new competitive dynamics while further destabilizing the ecosystem.
  • Proof of Concept: Any rewilding project must proceed through careful. It demands experimentation, trial phases, and rigorous review of existing literature. These will all be needed to maximize chances of success and minimize unintended consequences.

Intra- and Inter-Dependence of Species

Ecosystems are intricate webs with species depending on one another for food, shelter, pollination, seed dispersal, and countless other functions.

  • Physical and Genetic Identification: Restoration begins with precise identification of native species, both morphologically and genetically. This enables accurate matching of replacement stock and helps avoid mismatches that could undermine restoration.
  • Codependent Species: Many native species are mutually dependent. For example the relationship between native bees.; wildflowers or wading birds and wetlands. Successful rewilding requires restoration of these relationships, not just individual species.
  • Environmental Conditions: Beyond the species themselves, restoration must account for the specific environmental factors. Soil chemistry, water availability, fire regimes, and more allow these relationships to thrive.

These are the topics of the postings to follow

  • Review of State Key Initiatives
  • Structured outline for rewilding
  • Maximizing existing objectives
  • Marketing the concept for large scale rewilding of Florida
  • Call to action

SUMMARY

This is not just about legacy. This is your own quality of life; your own property value; your own cost of living. What are you thinking about when you don’t support initiatives, don’t press your representatives and spread invasive species? There are only three choices. 1. Fix it; 2. live with it as is; 3. abandon it and live with the consequences.

Let’s know your thoughts. Leave a reply jn the comment box below or start a thread in our discussion board.

If you wish to receive notifications of new postings enter your email and click on subscribe.

#rewilding #restoration #environment #risk/benefit #

Bauhinia and Hibiscus: A Comparison of Floral Reproduction

This posting is a response to the numerous hits made on a previous posting featuring the Non invasive Bauhinia tree. It seems that the interest lies in its reproductive nature. The purpose of this post is to improve the understanding of plant biology through comparative anatomy.

The title image shows the Bauhinia (blakeana ) on the left and the Florida native scarlet rosemallow (Hibiscus coccineus) on the right. I photographed the Bauhinia in the roadway median of our neighborhood. I photographed and display the scarlet rosemallow because it is such a stunning finding in the fresh water marshes of the Corkscrew Nature Preserve in SW Florida. It also shows that it is not a cultivar but it can self propagate without human intervention. Both plants are eye candy that must be appreciated in their out-of-door surroundings. In our community we have domesticated tropical hibiscus which are close relatives to the wild scarlet hibiscus

These two blossoming plants attract loads of attention. The Hong Kong orchid (Bauhinia blakeana ) and the cultivated tropical Hibiscus (Malvaceae) produce wonderful, flamboyant, visually attractive flowers. They are planted throughout our community. Additionally, these blooms have great staying power lasting for many months. Their flowering period stretches anywhere from eight to ten months, from September to June. They have, however, remarkably different reproductive powers. To reveal the secret of these two plants this posting compares the gross and micro anatomy of their two flowers.

A detailed diagram of a Bauhinia flower labeled with its anatomical parts, including bud, petal, sepal, stamen, pistil, ovary, style, and stigma, showcasing the flower's structure.
Bauhinia blossom with some pettals removed
Diagram labeling parts of a hibiscus flower including the stamen, ovary, style, stigma, petal, and sepal, accompanied by lush green leaves and a bud.
Hibiscus blossom with no petals removed

Gross and micro dissection reveals the major difference in the reproductive capacity of the these two perfect flowers. Dissection and microscopic examination of the ovaries shows that the hibiscus has ovaries while the bauhinia has no trace of ovules. It is unable to sexually reproduce.

Diagram illustrating the anatomy of a Bauhinia flower, highlighting its various parts including petal, sepal, stamen, anther, filament, ovary, style, stigma, and pistil. The text indicates that the flower is perfect but sterile, with no ovules or seeds.
This is a full dissection of the Bauhinia × blakeana blossom. Look at the top left images. You can see that under microscopic examination there are no ovaries within the ovary. This plant is infertile.

Anatomy diagram of a hibiscus flower, illustrating the components like the ovary, stigma, stamen, and petals, labeled with descriptions to explain its reproductive functions.
This is a full dissection of the Hibiscus blossom. Look at the top left images. You can see that under microscopic examination there are ovules within the ovary. This plant can produce seeds. It is fertile.

The five-petaled blossoms of Bauhinia plants are known as “perfect flowers,” because each individual bloom contains both female and male parts. Some varieties of the Bauhinia flower, such as the widely cultivated Hong Kong Orchid Tree (Bauhinia × blakeana), are known to be sterile. Bauhinia are monoecious, which means “single house”. This designation describes the dual sexual capacity in a single flower. The flowers can self pollinate or fertilize with pollen from another plant. The flowers attract pollinators such as hummingbirds, bees, butterflies, and more. Bauhinia × blakeana‘s sterility is due to its hybridization. Bauhinia blakeana is the result of conjugation of the very similar species Bauhinia purpurea ( Purple Camel’s Foot) and Bauhinia variegata ( Camel’s Foot Tree). Both of these are exotic species according to the Hong Kong Herbarium. The parent plants have partially overlapping flowering periods and geographical habitats, and the same range of bee and butterfly species as pollinators. Interbreeding Bauhinia purpurea and Bauhinia variegata is probable. The resulting triploidy of this plant has probably rendered this varietal sterile. The plants you see today are clones of the same flowers seen by Hongkongers more than a century ago. They are propagated asexually through cultivation of stem cuttings.

The Hibiscus is also considered a perfect flower which actually produces viable seeds. The hibiscus is a genus of flowering plants known for their large, showy flowers, belonging to the mallow family (Malvaceae). Fertilization of these plants is complex. Pollination may fail because of these five prerogatives.

  • Self-Pollination: Some hibiscus varieties are self-pollinating. This can make it difficult to cross-pollinate them.
  • Timing: Hibiscus flowers are only receptive to pollen for a short period, usually just a few hours.
  • Pollen Viability: Hibiscus pollen can lose its viability quickly.
  • Stigma Receptivity: The stigma needs to be receptive to pollen. The stigma, gateway to the ovarian, might not be receptive at the same time the pollen is viable.
  • Germination: Seeds take 12 to 24 months to bloom.

The hundreds of species of hibiscus are generated through human intervention of the pollination. Tropical hibiscus are propagated sexually from seeds or asexually from stem cuttings or plant division. In carefully controlled environments and with delicate, patient effort botinists have hybridized the tropical hibiscus to make hundreds of beautiful new varieties. The new plant varieties are propagated from cuttings or division to produced plants which are clones of their parents.

Illustration explaining hormonal fertility signals in plants during pollination, detailing four key hormones involved in the process.
In addition to timing, these four hormonal obstacles must be passed in the carpel for signaling a specific selection of pollen appropriate for germination of ovules in these species.

DISCUSSION of FINDINGS:

This is not a thorough scientific data collection. Three samples of blossoms from each of two trees were collected for a total sample size of six. All of the samples were made on the same day in April, 2020. There were no major local meteorological events for the year preceding this observation. There were no observations of the viability of the observed polled during this observation. Further study should be done to give this a high level of confidence of the conclusions.

SUMMARY:

In Florida the Bauhinia × blakeana and Hibiscus plants thrive and are found in almost all of the cultivated communities and household gardens. They are well tolerated but stable non-native species. Because of their reproductive limitations they are not invasive. We can feast our eyes on this banquet of form and color without fear of damaging the environment.

REFERENCE LINKS:

FEEDBACK:

Please use the box below for your comments.

If you wish to start a dialogue on this subject please use the Discussion Board.

For notification of new postings please enter your email address and click on the Subscribe box below

#Bauhinia #Hibiscus #reproduction #flowers #invasives #anatomy #seeds #sterile #

Revival of Pond Plants and Ecosystem Post-Hurricane Ian – Part Two

The plants of pond #47 are slowly recovering after hurricane Ian. This is part two of a three part series describing the slow recovery of the artificial pond that was created as part of a community wide system. Be sure to read part one of this series. The ten foot high storm surge from hurricane Ian brought seawater with its salt content and fish and other marine life. Because salt water is heavier than fresh water it sank to the bottom of the pond displacing a substantial portion of the fresh water. The ocean water is toxic to the fresh water species because it dehydrates the cells of salt intolerant plants and animals. This has been recovered by the inflow of fresh ground water and water filtered by community supplier. Now the water has a very low percentage of salt. My refractometric test for salinity tested on 5/1/2024 shows a near normal specific density of 1.002. We will discuss this in the next posting describing pond geochemistry.

The pond is surrounded by grassy lawns which are tended by the gardeners and home owners. At the water’s edge soil retaining mesh and plants have been added to prevent erosion. Most of these plants were thought to have been lost from toxic levels of salt. In the intervening two years they have begun to make a strong come back. They hold the soil, provide shelter for the marine animals and a feeding ground for the wading birds. Look at the previous post to see the birds feeding in grass and reed areas of the pond.

Pond plants

Net casting in pond to capture fish sample. This photo also shows round bright areas where Tilapia fish made nests
Soil retaining mesh submerged can be seen here. This was placed before the storm as part of the pond remediation.

Aquatic plant species used to reduce soil erosion.

Long view of pond looking from southeast to northwest.
Lance leaf Arrowhead, (Sagittaria lancifolia), Native, AKA Duck Potato.
Needle rush (Juncus roemerianus), Native
Horsetail spike rush (Eleocharis equisetoides) Native

Lawn, grass, Live Oak trees with marsh rushes and tubers surround the pond. They stabilize the soil and provide shelter and food as the basis of the ecosystem pyramid. It is only recently that the survivability of this plants was confirmed. Presence of these plants supports the concept of corner stone species. Without these plants the insects would not lay eggs. The fish would not feed on the insect larvae. The birds would not feed on the fish. This is further reflection of the eutrophic quality of the pond system.

Perhaps you have seen similar recoveries. Recall the experiences of the recovery of the Fulda river in Germany. Let’s hear about your experience! If you wish to contribute to the discussion please use the comment box.

The third of the three related postings on this pond will appear soon. It will describe the hydrochemistry and the micro aquatic inhabitants. Be sure to subscribe to follow along.

Also, feel free to use the discussion board to participate in one of the ongoing discussions or to introduce a new topic.

If you wish to be informed of new postings, lease enter your email and click on subscribe.

#Pond recovery #ocean water #Lance leaf Arrowhead #Needle rush #Horsetail spike rush #cornerstone species #

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑